Narita Airport vs KLIA2 Review – Part 1
Narita Airport vs KLIA2 Review
![]() |
The systematic planning at Narita Airport. |
In March 2019, I enjoyed visiting Narita International Airport in Tokyo and acquainted myself with its Terminal 3, dedicated to low-cost carriers.
![]() |
A view of KLIA Airport in Malaysia. |
However, if we go by passenger numbers, KLIA is pretty good after all, where we ranked No 4 for the 50-60 million passengers category.
And over on the AirHelp Airport Ranking 2019 site, KLIA comes in at a whopping number 120 with a score of 6.75 out of 10.
AirHelp focuses on passenger experiences, where the site ranks on-time performance, service quality and facilities as the main criteria.
On another airport ranking site called World Airport Codes, KLIA again comes in at Number 24 out of the Top 30 Airports in the World.
![]() |
KLIA Ranks No.54 in the Top 100 Airports in the World for 2019. |
Notice how Japan has four airports listed in the list of Top 10 Airports in Asia?
- Singapore Changi
- Tokyo Haneda
- Seoul Incheon
- Hong Kong
- Centrair Nagoya
- Tokyo Narita
- Kansai
- Taiwan Taoyuan
- Shanghai Hongqiao
- Seoul Gimpo
![]() |
The 2019 Skytrax Awards. |
Back to KLIA2, for some strange reason, Malaysia Airports, which operates the airport, had on several occasions (and in media interviews) earlier claimed that KLIA2 was not an LCCT.
![]() |
Narita’s Terminal 2 exterior. Photo Wikipedia. |
Carried Away….
Share this content:
Post Comment